[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimxP0ejc5i8cbEmdFidvCgH1pk5-Vc_WEGM2Hwa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:57:58 +0200
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: MugdhaKamoolkar <mugdha@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
BenoitCousson <b-cousson@...com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
HariKanigeri <h-kanigeri2@...com>, SumanAnna <s-anna@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add generic framework
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:24 AM, David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> Your intent "generic" is fine, but you've not achieved it and thus I
> think you shouldn't imply that you have. Dropping the word "generic"
> should suffice; it _is_ a framework, and maybe the next person working
> with hardware spinlocks can finish generalizing (and add use cases).
Sure, I can drop the word "generic".
> Haven't looked at RT in a long time. Just look at the current RT
> patchset to see if it still has several spinlock variants. ISTR the
> "raw" spinlock stuff came from there not long ago. Much compile-time
> magic was involved in switching between variants.
I'll take a look there and see if I catch anything relevant.
Thanks,
Ohad.
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists