linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix compile error and missing spin_unlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1291029490.3299.148.camel@odin>
Date:	Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:18:10 +0000
From:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix compile error and missing
 spin_unlock_irqrestore for NUC900 SoC audio

On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 17:38 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> This serial fixes compile error and missing spin_unlock_irqrestore for NUC900 SoC audio.
> 
> Regards,
> Axel
> 
> Axel Lin (5):
>   ASoC: Fix compile error for nuc900-ac97.c
>   ASoC: Fix prototype for nuc900_ac97_probe and nuc900_ac97_remove
>   ASoC: Fix compile error for nuc900-pcm.c
>   ASoC: Fix missing spin_unlock_irqrestore
>   ASoC: Remove unneeded !! operations while checking return value of
>     nuc900_checkready
> 
>  sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c  |   15 +++++++--------
>  sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-audio.h |    2 ++
>  sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-pcm.c   |   11 ++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 

All

Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
-- 
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/