linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] cs5535-gpio: convert from pci device to platform device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101129053642.3f302e2b@debxo>
Date:	Mon, 29 Nov 2010 05:36:42 -0800
From:	Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
To:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-geode@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dsd@...top.org, cjb@...top.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cs5535-gpio: convert from pci device to platform
 device

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:48:13 +0100
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Andres,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 08:44:26PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Samuel, thanks for applying the mfd patch.  I'm not sure how the
> > rest of these should be handled; they depend upon the first patch.
> > Would you prefer they go through the mfd tree, or go in via
> > Andrew's tree?
> I typically take them, unless the corresponding subsystem maintainers
> disagree with it. I also really much prefer to get an ACK from them
> before taking the patches.
> 

Ok.  In this case, there are no subsystem maintainers for patches #2
and #3 (GPIO and misc), so there's no one to really get an ACK from.
I'm also the author for both of the modules.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/