linux-kernel - Re: [REGRESSION] Suspend fails because of TPM modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101129151953.GA9501@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:19:53 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	Debora Velarde <debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@...rix.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Suspend fails because of TPM modules

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:15:21PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:

> I just found out, that if I modprobe tpm_tis module with
> 
> 	itpm=1
> 
> parameter, the problem doesn't happen any more and suspend works fine.
> 
> This definitely wasn't needed on older kernels though, so I'd consider 
> that still a regression.
> 
> Also, can't we make the module automatically detect the machines on which 
> to apply the workaround? Let's say, based on DMI?

http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/21/456

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/