[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CF3CADB.7060400@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:46:35 -0200
From: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Debora Velarde <debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcel Selhorst <m.selhorst@...rix.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...e.com>, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] Suspend fails because of TPM modules
On 11/29/2010 01:32 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:26:19PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
>> Any ideas why other kernels were OK (.34) and didn't require this quirk on
>> my machine at all?
> We previously ignored devices that had an invalid PNP ID in _HID,
> whereas now we still pay attention to them if they have a valid ID in
> _CID.
>
Yeah, and to make sense with my previous post, the workaround I
mentioned depended on a module option given that the device couldn't be
detected without having to send it commands.
Rajiv
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists