[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ACufPs18wia8MYpjp9nDnYJgSmw018P6_WhR9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:21:47 +0800
From: microcai <microcai@...oraproject.org>
To: pavel@...linux.ru
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Repalce strncmp by memcmp
2010/11/29 Pavel Vasilyev <pavel@...linux.ru>:
>
> This patch replace all strncmp(a, b, c) by memcmp(a, b, c).
>
> I test on x86_64 (AMD Opteron 285).
>
> #include <string.h>
> char *A = "0000";
> void test_memcmp(void) {
> memcmp(A, "TEST", 4);
> }
> void test_strn(void) {
> strncmp(A, "TEST", 4);
> }
> # gcc -c -O2 test.c
> # objdump -d test.o
> ...
>
> 0000000000000020 <test_strncmp>:
> 20: f3 c3 repz retq
> 22: 66 66 66 66 66 2e 0f data32 data32 data32 data32 nopw
> %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
> 29: 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00
>
> 0000000000000030 <test_memcmp>:
> 30: f3 c3 repz retq
>
> Wow, minus one commad :)
>
Wow, good, I test that patch ... can't see any performance
improvements. but... works fine. and mem* generally better than str*
one, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists