[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12794.1291053037@localhost>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:50:37 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: microcai@...oraproject.org
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>,
"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Lisa Milne <lisa@...net.com>,
"jonsmirl@...il.com" <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-console@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: VT console need rewrite
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:14:06 +0800, Microcai said:
> The thing is, you really should agree that, implementing UNICODE font in
> kernel isn't a bad idea.
Let us know when you have implemented support for bidirectional
scripts that require compositing or half-spacing characters. Without
blowing out the 8K kernel stack.
Doing it *right* is important:
http://gizmodo.com/382026/a-cellphones-missing-dot-kills-two-people-puts-three-more-in-jail
Two dead, three in jail. All because of broken font support. That's a good
reason to not even try unless you can do it *right*.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists