linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: Make the instruction emulator aware of Nested Virtualization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:32:12 +0100
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc:	"Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: Make the instruction emulator aware of Nested
	Virtualization

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:23:38PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> (Sorry for late reply...)
> 
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:23:13 +0100, "Roedel, Joerg" said:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:17:53AM -0500, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 11/25/2010 03:13 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> > > What about things like adding instructions and forgetting to add the 
> > > corresponding svm.c code?
> > Cannot happen. Every instruction that can be intercepted with SVM is
> > already handled in this patch-set.
> 
> Call us back when Intel releases the i9 and i11 with new instructions
> that need intercept handling. ;)

How does that affect SVM?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/