| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:07:25 +0100 From: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com> Cc: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gdb@...rceware.org, hellogcc@...elists.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Built kernel without -O2 option On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:51 PM, richard -rw- weinberger > <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote: >>>> [...] >>> No, I didn't mean this, I meant some function that have to be inlined >>> are those who only work when being inlined, e.g. current_text_addr(). >> >> Can you please explain to me why some functions work only when they are inlined? >> Is it because of asm() black magic? >> > obviously, you do not understand the purpose of this function... this is why i was asking! anyway, now i got it. thanks to peter zijlstra for the kind explanation on #kernelnewbies. > - Arnaud > -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists