[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101129024918.GA5218@cr0.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:49:18 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Microcai <microcai@...oraproject.org>
Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
"jonsmirl@...il.com" <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-console@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VT console need rewrite
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:10:06AM +0800, Microcai wrote:
>在 2010-11-28日的 20:11 +0100,Samuel Thibault写道:
>> Microcai, le Sun 28 Nov 2010 22:29:05 +0800, a écrit :
>> > So, here is the design according to your description ..
>> >
>> > JUST export /dev/fb and /dev/pts and /dev/console
>> > The kernel use /dev/console, but invisible.
>> > The rest of the world uses /dev/pts
>> >
>> > Make init using /dev/fb to display boot message, and agetty runs
>> > on /dev/pts
>>
>> Errr, but that already exists, that's fbterm...
>>
>> Samuel
>
>Every time someone try to implement something , some other guy will jump
>out and say, that already exist, in user-space ..... blablablabla
>
Remember, remember, kernel provides a mechanism, not a policy.
(From this point, auto-groups *does* break it.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists