lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291093230.2405.191.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:00:30 +0800
From:	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To:	mat <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@...il.com>,
	Xuxian Jiang <jiang@...ncsu.edu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: -tip tree resume fail, bisect to 5bd5a45(x86: Add NX
 protection for kernel data)

On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 01:31 +0800, mat wrote:
> Le Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:55:27 +0100,
> mat <castet.matthieu@...e.fr> a écrit :
> 
> > Le Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:42:47 +0100,
> > Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> a écrit :
> > 
> > > > That seems to be a S3 specific code path, that won't fix anything.
> > > > Simply do:
> > > > 
> > > > echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online;
> > > > echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online;
> > > > 
> > > > and your machine will explode..
> > > 
> > > The SMP startup trampoline is copied I believe
> > > and only executed in real mode without page tables.
> > > 
> > > So it's perhaps not the trampoline, but the early startup 
> > > code that ends up being broken.
> > yes :
> > acpi wakeup code and smp trampoline are copied in low memory (first
> > 1MB).
> > 
> > So they can't end up int the kernel data mapping ?
> > 
> > So it should something else.
> > 
> > I will try to investigate on this.
> > 
> Unfortunately on my laptop supporting NX, suspend to ram seems broken
> (even without this patch) and I got only one core, so I am unable to
> test it.
> 
> Does cpu suspend/resume is broken ? Or it is only S3 ?
> 
> If yes, are there any interesting trace if we suspend only one core with
> sysfs.

echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online;
echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online;

then machine just reboots...

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matthieu


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ