[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CF4B778.90604@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:36:08 +0900
From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: fix incorrect proc spurious output
Fix the problem that all the /proc/irq/XX/spurious files shows the IRQ
0 information.
Current irq_spurious_proc_open() passes on NULL as the 3rd argument,
which is used as an IRQ number in irq_spurious_proc_show(), to the
single_open(). Because of this, all the /proc/irq/XX/spurious file
shows IRQ 0 information regardless of the IRQ number.
To fix the problem, irq_spurious_proc_open() must pass on the
appropreate data (IRQ number) to single_open().
Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/irq/proc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-next-20101125/kernel/irq/proc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-next-20101125.orig/kernel/irq/proc.c
+++ linux-next-20101125/kernel/irq/proc.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int irq_spurious_proc_show(struct
static int irq_spurious_proc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
- return single_open(file, irq_spurious_proc_show, NULL);
+ return single_open(file, irq_spurious_proc_show, PDE(inode)->data);
}
static const struct file_operations irq_spurious_proc_fops = {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists