[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101130090934.GC3952@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:09:34 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] input: mt: Add pressure to pointer emulation code
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:20:07PM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> >> @@ -124,9 +125,13 @@ void input_mt_report_pointer_emulation(struct input_dev
> *dev)
>
> >> if (oldest) {
> >> int x = input_mt_get_value(oldest, ABS_MT_POSITION_X);
> >> int y = input_mt_get_value(oldest, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y);
> >> + int p = input_mt_get_value(oldest, ABS_MT_PRESSURE);
> >
> > What if device does not report ABS_MT_PRESSURE/ABS_PRESSURE? Do we rely
> > on input core to suppress unsupported events? A comment would be nice...
>
>
> Yes, the setup values are the only ones producing output here. How about this
> addition to the function text: "The input core ensures only the KEY and ABS axes
> already setup for this device will produce output."?
Yep, that works.
>
> > Also, is there a gelper to set up pointer emulation capabilities for MT
> > device?
>
>
> This is certainly the plan with time, but currently it seemed best to leave the
> rest of the event setup code untouched.
>
OK, just throwing ideas around ;)
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists