[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CF4DE00.4030105@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:20:32 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Mitch Bradley <wmb@...mworks.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>, sodaville@...utronix.de,
x86@...nel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86/dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 23:47 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
>> That may not be wise. Your real bus heirarchy may not be architecturally
>> defined on some systems so you can't incorporate it into code, nor is it
>> necessarily a heirarchy - eg some of the Geodes.
>
> Ok, so I'd suggest doing something like:
>
> - pci is below the corresponding atom node
> - isa is a child of pci
>
> The later is a useful representation even if it doesn't correspond to
> reality. From an address representation perspective, ISA can be
> considered somewhat as a substractive decoding child of PCI (again even
> if that's not 100% true), which simplifies the representation in the
> device-tree a bit, and allows to still have things like VGA devices on
> the PCI segment that decode IO ports in the ISA range.
okay.
> Cheers,
> Ben.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists