[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011291600020.21653@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:01:18 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>
cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com,
lethal@...ux-sh.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
shaohui.zheng@...ux.intel.com, dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
gregkh@...e.de, Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [2/8, v5] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: Add node hotplug emulation
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, shaohui.zheng@...el.com wrote:
> From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>
> Add an interface to allow new nodes to be added when performing memory
> hot-add. This provides a convenient interface to test memory hotplug
> notifier callbacks and surrounding hotplug code when new nodes are
> onlined without actually having a machine with such hotpluggable SRAT
> entries.
>
> This adds a new debugfs interface at /sys/kernel/debug/hotplug/add_node
> that behaves in a similar way to the memory hot-add "probe" interface.
> Its format is size@...rt, where "size" is the size of the new node to be
> added and "start" is the physical address of the new memory.
>
Looks like you've changed some of the references in my changlog to
node/add_node, but not others, such as the above. I'd actually much
rather prefer to take Greg's latest suggestion of doing
s/hotplug/mem_hotplug instead.
Would it be possible to repost the patch with that change?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists