linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, NMI: add back unknown_nmi_panic and nmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101130131517.GA16372@lenovo>
Date:	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:15:17 +0300
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, fweisbec@...il.com,
	yinghai@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, NMI: add back unknown_nmi_panic and
	nmi_watchdog sysctls

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 05:07:17PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> Originally adapted from Huang Ying's patch which moved the unknown_nmi_panic
> to the traps.c file.  Because the old nmi watchdog was deleted before this
> change happened, the unknown_nmi_panic sysctl was lost.  This re-adds it.
> 
> Also, the nmi_watchdog sysctl was re-implemented and its documentation
> updated accordingly.
> 
> Patch-inspired-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>

(a 'thing' below which could be addressed later)
...
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index d91b07d..140344d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -733,6 +733,22 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
>  		.extra1		= &zero,
>  		.extra2		= &one,
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.procname       = "nmi_watchdog",
> +		.data           = &watchdog_enabled,
> +		.maxlen         = sizeof (int),
> +		.mode           = 0644,
> +		.proc_handler   = proc_dowatchdog_enabled,
> +	},
> +#endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC) && defined(CONFIG_X86)

This kinda wonders me -- do we have CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC set _without_
CONFIG_X86? I mean CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is per x86, no?

  Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/