[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zksqeway.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:11:01 -0500
From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@...il.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Reclaim invalidated page ASAP
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:18:22 +0000, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
> I would agree except as said elsewhere, it's a chicken and egg problem.
> We don't have a real world test because fadvise is not useful in its
> current iteration. I'm hoping that there will be a test comparing
>
> rsync on vanilla kernel
> rsync on patched kernel
> rsync+patch on vanilla kernel
> rsync+patch on patched kernel
>
> Are the results of such a test likely to happen?
>
Yes, absolutely, although I'm sorry it has taken so long. Between
thanksgiving and the impending end of the semester things have been a
bit hectic. Nevertheless, I just finished putting together a script to
record some metics from /proc/vmstat and /proc/[pid]/statm, so at this
point I'm ready to finally take some data. Any suggestions for
particular patterns to look for in the numbers or other metrics to
record are welcome. Cheers,
- Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists