[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101130145712.GD26758@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:57:12 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] maximize dispatching in block throttle
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:46:01PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> When dispatching bio, the quantum is divided into read/write budgets,
> and dispatching for write could not exceed the write budget even if
> the read budget is not exhausted, either dispatching for read.
>
> It is changed to exhaust the quantum, if possible, in this work for
> dispatching bio.
>
> Though it is hard to understand that 50/50 division is not selected,
> the difference between divisions could impact little on dispatching as
> much as quantum allows then.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
> ---
Hi Hillf,
Even if there are not enough READS/WRITES to consume the quantum, I don't
think that it changes anyting much. The next dispatch round will be
scheduled almost immediately (If there are bios which are ready to
be dispatched). Look at throtl_schedule_next_dispatch().
Have you noticed some issues/improvements with this patch?
Generally READS are more latency sensitive as compared to WRITE hence
I thought of dispatching more READS per quantum.
Thanks
Vivek
>
> --- a/block/blk-throttle.c 2010-11-01 19:54:12.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/block/blk-throttle.c 2010-11-26 21:49:00.000000000 +0800
> @@ -647,11 +647,16 @@ static int throtl_dispatch_tg(struct thr
> unsigned int max_nr_reads = throtl_grp_quantum*3/4;
> unsigned int max_nr_writes = throtl_grp_quantum - nr_reads;
> struct bio *bio;
> + int read_throttled = 0, write_throttled = 0;
>
> /* Try to dispatch 75% READS and 25% WRITES */
> -
> + try_read:
> while ((bio = bio_list_peek(&tg->bio_lists[READ]))
> - && tg_may_dispatch(td, tg, bio, NULL)) {
> + && ! read_throttled) {
> + if (! tg_may_dispatch(td, tg, bio, NULL)) {
> + read_throttled = 1;
> + break;
> + }
>
> tg_dispatch_one_bio(td, tg, bio_data_dir(bio), bl);
> nr_reads++;
> @@ -659,9 +664,15 @@ static int throtl_dispatch_tg(struct thr
> if (nr_reads >= max_nr_reads)
> break;
> }
> -
> + if (! bio)
> + read_throttled = 1;
> + try_write:
> while ((bio = bio_list_peek(&tg->bio_lists[WRITE]))
> - && tg_may_dispatch(td, tg, bio, NULL)) {
> + && ! write_throttled) {
> + if (! tg_may_dispatch(td, tg, bio, NULL)) {
> + write_throttled = 1;
> + break;
> + }
>
> tg_dispatch_one_bio(td, tg, bio_data_dir(bio), bl);
> nr_writes++;
> @@ -669,7 +680,23 @@ static int throtl_dispatch_tg(struct thr
> if (nr_writes >= max_nr_writes)
> break;
> }
> + if (! bio)
> + write_throttled = 1;
> +
> + if (write_throttled && read_throttled)
> + goto out;
>
> + if (! (throtl_grp_quantum > nr_writes + nr_reads))
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (read_throttled) {
> + max_nr_writes = throtl_grp_quantum - nr_reads;
> + goto try_write;
> + } else {
> + max_nr_reads = throtl_grp_quantum - nr_writes;
> + goto try_read;
> + }
> + out:
> return nr_reads + nr_writes;
> }
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists