[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1291141220.2623.13.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:20:19 -0800
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"indou.takao@...fujitsu.com" <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix dmar fault interrupt problems
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 10:13 -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Suresh Siddha (suresh.b.siddha@...el.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 00:28 -0800, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here are patches to fix the following problems regarding dmar fault interrupt.
> > >
> > > - No dmar fault event is notified in x2apic cluster mode
> > > - Changing IRQ affinity of dmar fault interrupt causes "No irq handler
> > > for vector (irq XX)" message and dmar fault interrupts are never
> > > notified after that.
> >
> > Kenji, In addition to these two, there are couple of more patches that
> > are needed to fix the kexec/kdump issue that we are debugging on RH
> > bugzilla.
> >
> > I will post all these 4 patches shortly. I already noticed and queued
> > the second patch (dmar irq migration) you mentioned.
>
> And one of them (the additional call to flushing existing dmar faults)
> is not needed.
yes, that patch is not needed for the current kexec/kdump issue. But
nevertheless that is an issue that needs to be addressed aswell.
thanks,
suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists