[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101130182251.GC20818@lenovo>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:22:51 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
yinghai@...nel.org, brgerst@...il.com, penberg@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED#2 04/16] x86: Use local variable to cache
smp_processor_id() in setup_local_APIC()
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 07:11:45PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> This is a trivial clean up.
>
> * Move initialization of @cpu inside preemption disabled region as
> suggested by Cyrill Gorcunov.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
> ---
> Alright, updated yet again, but I frankly don't see the point in these
code structure, if we would be referring variable taken inside preempt
off this always look suspicious, i think you agree with me :)
> changes. If setup_local_APIC() is being run from a different CPU, we
> have a much larger problem. We're already accessing cpu local
> resources (tsc, lapic) outside of preemption disabled area. But,
> anyways, I don't think it matters one way or the other.
>
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists