linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Built kernel without -O2 option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:40:39 -0800
From:	Michael Snyder <msnyder@...are.com>
To:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
CC:	Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gdb@...rceware.org" <gdb@...rceware.org>,
	"hellogcc@...elists.org" <hellogcc@...elists.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Built kernel without -O2 option

Américo Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:12:16AM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:59 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Now, there are a lot of ways to debug the Linux kernel with GDB, like
>>>> qemu, kgtp or kgdb and so on.
>>>> But the developer more like add a printk. It have a lot of reason, a big one is:
>>>> (gdb) p ret
>>>> $3 = <value optimized out>
>>>> And the code execution order is not right.
>>> Really the right place to fix a lot of this would be gcc (and perhaps
>>> gdb). I suspect with some careful work the debugging experience
>>> for -O2 could be improved a lot.
>>> I also believe the latest gccs already have improvements in this area.
>> The VTA branch was merged for GCC 4.5
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Var_Tracking_Assignments
>> Which helps a lot with generating dwarf for previously "optimized out"
>> values. There were also a couple of papers on generating even better
>> debuginfo at the recent GCC Summit: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/summit2010
>>
>> Jakub Jelínek, Improving debug info for optimized away parameters
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/summit2010?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=jelinek.pdf
>> Alexandre Oliva, Consistent Views at Recommended Breakpoints
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/summit2010?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=oliva.pdf
>>
> 
> Cool! It would be much more convenient if this is solved by gcc.

Those features mentioned at the GCC summit are not real close to 
completion.  I wouldn't put off the discussion just because they're
(possibly) in the pipeline.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/