linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel/time: Make /proc/timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:22:23 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/time: Make /proc/timer_list mode 0400

Hi!

> > > > iirc powertop parses this..
> > > 
> > > I bet it doesn't look at the kernel address (why was that added in the
> > > first place, anyway?)
> > > 
> > > I'd suggest that the risk of breakage would be much less if we left the
> > > file permissions alone and arranged for those addresses to be
> > > 0000000000000000 for non-root readers.
> > 
> > You beat me to it. Having the full information is quite helpful at
> > times.
> 
> We should do something like:
> 
> 	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> 		print_ptr = NULL;
> 
> 	sprintf(s, "%p", print_ptr);

Having single file that contains different stuff based on capable() is
very very ugly.
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/