lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:29:51 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [thisops uV3 07/18] highmem: Use this_cpu_xx_return()
 operations

Le mardi 30 novembre 2010 à 13:26 -0600, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> > >  {
> > > -	int idx = --__get_cpu_var(__kmap_atomic_idx);
> > > +	int idx = __this_cpu_dec_return(__kmap_atomic_idx);
> >
> > __this_cpu_dec_return() is only needed if CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM
> >
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM
> > >  	BUG_ON(idx < 0);
> > >  #endif
> > >
> >
> > You could change kmap_atomic_idx_pop() to return void, and use
> > __this_cpu_dec(__kmap_atomic_idx)
> 
> The following would do?
> 
> 
> Subject: highmem: Use this_cpu_dec instead of __this_cpu_dec_return if !DEBUG_HIGHMEM
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/highmem.h |    9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/highmem.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/highmem.h	2010-11-30 13:23:44.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/highmem.h	2010-11-30 13:24:54.000000000 -0600
> @@ -95,14 +95,19 @@ static inline int kmap_atomic_idx(void)
>  	return __this_cpu_read(__kmap_atomic_idx) - 1;
>  }
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM
>  static inline int kmap_atomic_idx_pop(void)
>  {
>  	int idx = __this_cpu_dec_return(__kmap_atomic_idx);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM
>  	BUG_ON(idx < 0);
> -#endif
>  	return idx;
>  }
> +#else
> +static inline void kmap_atomic_idx_pop(void)
> +{
> +	__this_cpu_dec(__kmap_atomic_idx);
> +}
> +#endif
> 
>  #endif
> 


well maybe a single prototype ;)

static inline void kmap_atomic_idx_pop(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM
	int idx = __this_cpu_dec_return(__kmap_atomic_idx);
	BUG_ON(idx < 0);
#else
      __this_cpu_dec(__kmap_atomic_idx);
#endif
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ