linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix dmar fault interrupt problems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101130222039.GJ10050@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date:	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:20:39 -0800
From:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"indou.takao@...fujitsu.com" <indou.takao@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix dmar fault interrupt problems

* Suresh Siddha (suresh.b.siddha@...el.com) wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 11:28 -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> > AFAICT, it just becomes a duplicate call in a narrow window.
> > 
> > native_smp_prepare_cpus() (or APIC_init_uniprocessor()):
> >  enable_IR_x2apic()
> >   enable_IR()
> >    enable_intr_remapping() <-- clears faults
> >  default_setup_apic_routing()
> >    enable_drhd_fault_handling() <-- added call to clear faults
> > 
> > That's what I meant by not needed.
> 
> I agree that we will call clear faults twice.
> 
> With out the second clear fault, any fault in that narrow window of
> enabling intr-remapping and enabling fault handling will go unnoticed
> and block further faults getting reported.
> 
> I am not sure if the first fault is necessary. I can check and remove it
> if not needed.
> 
> Ideally we want to do something like:
> 
> Setup fault handling
> Clear any faults
> Enable intr-remapping

Agree, that's ideal.

> But fault handling interrupt configuration depends on the apic mode that
> gets selected based on whether intr-remapping was enabled successfully
> or not. And hence we were enabling fault handling after enabling the
> intr-remapping mode.
> 
> I can see if I can cleanup any of these flows for 2.6.38. For 2.6.37 and
> older kernels I would like to keep the patch simple.

Yup, makes sense.

thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/