linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add generic framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101130222328.GB17222@atomide.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:23:29 -0800
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Cc:	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Hari Kanigeri <h-kanigeri2@...com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add generic framework

* Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com> [101130 14:10]:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> > Do we even need the hwspin_lock variants,
> 
> I personally don't have any specific use case in mind.
> 
> It's just a simple wrapper over the _timeout variants, provided for
> API completeness, but -
> 
> > why can't we always use the hwspin_lock_timeout variants?
> 
> We can. I can just remove the _lock variants.

OK sounds good to me.

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/