[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101130233250.35603401C8@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:32:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To: michal.simek@...alogix.com
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
John Williams <john.williams@...alogix.com>,
"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Flushing whole page instead of work for ptrace
This is a VM question more than a ptrace question.
I can't give you any authoritative answers about the VM issues.
Documentation/cachetlb.txt says:
Any time the kernel writes to a page cache page, _OR_
the kernel is about to read from a page cache page and
user space shared/writable mappings of this page potentially
exist, this routine is called.
In your case, the kernel is only reading (write=0 passed to
access_process_vm and get_user_pages). In normal situations,
the page in question will have only a private and read-only
mapping in user space. So the call should not be required in
these cases--if the code can tell that's so.
Perhaps something like the following would be safe.
But you really need some VM folks to tell you for sure.
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 02e48aa..2864ee7 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1484,7 +1484,8 @@ int __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
pages[i] = page;
flush_anon_page(vma, page, start);
- flush_dcache_page(page);
+ if ((vm_flags & VM_WRITE) || (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
+ flush_dcache_page(page);
}
if (vmas)
vmas[i] = vma;
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists