linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2 2/3] ACPI, APEI, Add APEI generic error status print support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTimxPqx_VUBBrmgA1gzYz1p4kC1SQBJO-vv570f+@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:56:46 +0800
From:	huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
To:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 2/3] ACPI, APEI, Add APEI generic error status print support

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>> +     for (i = 0; i < strs_size; i++) {
>> +             if (!(bits & (1U << i)))
>> +                     continue;
>> +             str = strs[i];
>> +             if (len && len + strlen(str) + 2 > 80) {
>> +                     printk("\n");
>> +                     len = 0;
>> +             }
>> +             if (!len)
>> +                     len = pr_pfx(pfx, "%s", str);
>> +             else
>> +                     len += printk(", %s", str);
>> +     }
>> +     if (len)
>> +             printk("\n");
>
> Does printk() offer any guarantees about getting all the characters
> from a single printk() call out to the console without interleaving
> with messages from printk() calls on other cpus?  If it does, then
> it would be a good idea to sprintf() the parts of this message to
> a buffer and then use one printk() call.  I think I read that netconsole
> ends up with one packet on the wire for each call to printk().
>
> Trying to parse output jumbled together from multiple cpus
> doesn't sound like fun.

Yes. Will do that.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/