linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] Provide control over unmapped pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:35:50 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Provide control over unmapped pages

On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:52:59 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> * Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2010-12-01 10:48:16]:
> 
> > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2010-12-01 10:32:54]:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:46:31 +0530
> > > Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Provide control using zone_reclaim() and a boot parameter. The
> > > > code reuses functionality from zone_reclaim() to isolate unmapped
> > > > pages and reclaim them as a priority, ahead of other mapped pages.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/linux/swap.h |    5 ++-
> > > >  mm/page_alloc.c      |    7 +++--
> > > >  mm/vmscan.c          |   72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> > > > index eba53e7..78b0830 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/swap.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
> > > > @@ -252,11 +252,12 @@ extern int vm_swappiness;
> > > >  extern int remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page);
> > > >  extern long vm_total_pages;
> > > >  
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > > > -extern int zone_reclaim_mode;
> > > >  extern int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio;
> > > >  extern int sysctl_min_slab_ratio;
> > > >  extern int zone_reclaim(struct zone *, gfp_t, unsigned int);
> > > > +extern bool should_balance_unmapped_pages(struct zone *zone);
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > > > +extern int zone_reclaim_mode;
> > > >  #else
> > > >  #define zone_reclaim_mode 0
> > > >  static inline int zone_reclaim(struct zone *z, gfp_t mask, unsigned int order)
> > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > > index 62b7280..4228da3 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > > @@ -1662,6 +1662,9 @@ zonelist_scan:
> > > >  			unsigned long mark;
> > > >  			int ret;
> > > >  
> > > > +			if (should_balance_unmapped_pages(zone))
> > > > +				wakeup_kswapd(zone, order);
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > Hm, I'm not sure the final vision of this feature. Does this reclaiming feature
> > > can't be called directly via balloon driver just before alloc_page() ?
> > >
> > 
> > That is a separate patch, this is a boot paramter based control
> > approach.
> >  
> > > Do you need to keep page caches small even when there are free memory on host ?
> > >
> > 
> > The goal is to avoid duplication, as you know page cache fills itself
> > to consume as much memory as possible. The host generally does not
> > have a lot of free memory in a consolidated environment. 
> >

That's a point. Then, why the guest has to do _extra_ work for host even when
the host says nothing ? I think trigger this by guests themselves is not very good.

Thanks,
-Kame



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/