[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5heia2ni58.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:04:19 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: "Li, Yan I" <yan.i.li@...el.com>
Cc: Tobyn Bertram <tobynbertram@...mail.com>,
'Dmitry Torokhov' <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ding, Jian-feng" <jian-feng.ding@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"meego-kernel@...ts.meego.com" <meego-kernel@...ts.meego.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: Bug 18122 - Support Lenovo S10-3t's 2-button ClickPad
At Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:11:04 +0800,
Li, Yan I wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:48:12PM +0800, Tobyn Bertram wrote:
> > I do not have a S10-3t. I have a HP DV7t with a standard 1 button Clickpad.
> > I am sorry for any confusion.
>
> Thank you. This clarify the S10-3t touchpad mystery. So I think my v2
> patch is valid.
>
> > I think that 2 different Clickpads will need to be defined: 1 button
> > Clickpads and 2 button Clickpads. Maybe like this?
> >
> > #define SYN_CAP_CLICKPAD1BTN(ex0c) ((ex0c) & 0x100000)
> > #define SYN_CAP_CLICKPAD2BTN(ex0c) ((ex0c) & 0x000100)
>
> Maybe, although we don't have any code that needs
> SYN_CAP_CLICKPAD2BTN() so far, only 1-button clickpad needs special
> handling, but it's good to have a more precise name.
Agreed. Also, it's interesting to see how 2-button clickpad devices
behave in multi-touch mode...
thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists