[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101130162938.8a6b0df4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:29:38 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
"Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@...app.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] vmalloc: eagerly clear ptes on vunmap
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:32:11 -0800
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> When unmapping a region in the vmalloc space, clear the ptes immediately.
> There's no point in deferring this because there's no amortization
> benefit.
>
> The TLBs are left dirty, and they are flushed lazily to amortize the
> cost of the IPIs.
>
> This specific motivation for this patch is a regression since 2.6.36 when
> using NFS under Xen, triggered by the NFS client's use of vm_map_ram()
> introduced in 56e4ebf877b6043c289bda32a5a7385b80c17dee. XFS also uses
> vm_map_ram() and could cause similar problems.
>
Do we have any quantitative info on that regression? The patch fixed
it, I assume?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists