[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101201085252.GO10050@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 00:52:52 -0800
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Max Asbock <masbock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
indou.takao@...fujitsu.com,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] vt-d: handle previous faults after enabling fault
handling
* Suresh Siddha (suresh.b.siddha@...el.com) wrote:
> Fault handling is getting enabled after enabling the interrupt-remapping (as
> the success of interrupt-remapping can affect the apic mode and hence the
> fault handling mode).
>
> Hence there can potentially be some faults between the window of enabling
> interrupt-remapping in the vt-d and the fault-handling of the vt-d units.
>
> Handle any previous faults after enabling the vt-d fault handling.
>
> For v2.6.38 cleanup, need to check if we can remove the dmar_fault() in the
> enable_intr_remapping() and see if we can enable fault handling along with
> enabling intr-remapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists