[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291203462.2856.607.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:37:42 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
"Pekka Savola (ipv6)" <pekkas@...core.fi>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next-2.6] : __in_dev_get_rtnl() can use
rtnl_dereference()
Le mercredi 01 décembre 2010 à 12:21 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Same here. RTNL is held. Please use __in_dev_get_rtnl()
By the way we can use rtnl_dereference() in __in_dev_get_rtnl()
[PATCH net-next-2.6] : __in_dev_get_rtnl() can use rtnl_dereference()
If caller holds RTNL, we dont need a memory barrier
(smp_read_barrier_depends) included in rcu_dereference().
Just use rtnl_dereference() to properly document the assertions.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
include/linux/inetdevice.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/inetdevice.h b/include/linux/inetdevice.h
index 2b86eaf..ae8fdc5 100644
--- a/include/linux/inetdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/inetdevice.h
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static inline struct in_device *in_dev_get(const struct net_device *dev)
static inline struct in_device *__in_dev_get_rtnl(const struct net_device *dev)
{
- return rcu_dereference_check(dev->ip_ptr, lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
+ return rtnl_dereference(dev->ip_ptr);
}
extern void in_dev_finish_destroy(struct in_device *idev);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists