| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:21:45 +0800 From: Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com> To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, 乔崇 <qiaochong@...ngson.cn>, hellogcc@...elists.org, Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gdb@...rceware.org Subject: Re: [hellogcc] Re: [PATCH] Built kernel without -O2 option On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 06:03, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:10:29PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote: >> That may result in issues - the problem is that there are places in the kernel >> where 'gcc -O0' will *compile* cleanly, but not actually *run* correctly. > > Since nobody (no-bo-dy) runs kernel with -O0, I'd suggest original > poster to learn how to debug kernel with constrained information. > > I'll be most certainly faster. :^) > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > Do you know Linux kernel cannot be built with "gcc -O0" now? I think you should said "Since nobody (no-bo-dy) don't want built kernel with -O0". But how you know all the people's idea? :) Thanks, Hui -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists