[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1012010948270.1629-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:59:49 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Nobody cared about IRQs at shutdown
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> >
> > > In fact, I think that there is something bad, not specific to USB,
> > > FireWire or SATA. Without systemd, all those subsystems function
> > > properly at shutdown. With systemd, it looks like there are many
> > > mishandled interrupts (all of USB, FireWire and SATA) at shutdown.
> > > What  could be this common thing? ACPI?
> >
> > I don't know -- what is systemd?
>
> Systemd is a new init developed by Lennart Poettering. You can learn more at http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd
>
> It employs high concurrency in starting and stopping services, starts many things on demand and thus boots faster than the traditional SysV init. And also exposes this bug :(
All right.
One last test. What happens if you unbind the firewire driver and all
the UHCI controllers except the one attached to IRQ 16?
Possible explanations: IRQs are being misrouted, so the system thinks
it gets IRQ 16 when in fact a different interrupt line was activated
(this is related to ACPI, but I don't see any connection to systemd).
Or the interrupt layer is malfunctioning and it thinks IRQs are
arriving when they aren't.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists