lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101201162335.GB2511@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:23:35 -0500
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Haren Myneni <hbabu@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf hw  in kexeced kernel broken in tip

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 05:11:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 11:06 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 12:27:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 00:00 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > > First kernel:
> > > > [    1.139418] calling  init_hw_perf_events+0x0/0xb77 @ 1
> > > > [    1.159111] Performance Events: PEBS fmt1+, Nehalem events, Intel PMU
> > > > driver.
> > > > [    1.159567] ... version:                3
> > > > [    1.179121] ... bit width:              48
> > > > [    1.179353] ... generic registers:      4
> > > > [    1.179593] ... value mask:             0000ffffffffffff
> > > > [    1.199211] ... max period:             000000007fffffff
> > > > [    1.199554] ... fixed-purpose events:   3
> > > > [    1.219108] ... event mask:             000000070000000f
> > > > [    1.219454] initcall init_hw_perf_events+0x0/0xb77 returned 0 after
> > > > 11719 usecs
> > > > 
> > > > .....
> > > > [   20.220997] checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#11]: passed.
> > > > [   20.260818] NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
> > > > 
> > > > kexeced kernel.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > [    1.169470] calling  init_hw_perf_events+0x0/0xb77 @ 1
> > > > [    1.189265] Performance Events: PEBS fmt1+, Nehalem events, Broken
> > > > PMU hardware detected, software events only.
> > > > ...
> > > > [   21.010407] NMI watchdog failed to create perf event on cpu14:
> > > > fffffffffffffffe
> > > > 
> > > > caused by:
> > > 
> > > *sigh*, and people ask me why kexec/kdump are such bad ideas..
> > > 
> > > apparently kexec doesn't properly shut down the first kernel and leaves
> > > a counter running, then when we write and read the counter value they
> > > don't match because its still running and voila, crap happens.
> > > 
> > > I've CC'ed the kexec people, maybe they got clue as to how to sort this.
> > 
> > So we can shutdown counters while first kernel is going down. Is there a
> > simple function already which I can call?
> 
> Dunno, the cpu hotplug stuff should suffice I think, but then I don't
> think you actually unplug the boot cpu.
> 
> What does kexec normally do to ensure hardware is left in a sane state?

Typically calls device_shutdown() and sysdev_shutdown() from
kernel_restart_prepare() to shutdown the devices.

Also calls machine_shutdown() which depending on architecture can take
care of various things like stopping other cpus, shutting down LAPIC, 
disabling IOAPIC, disabling hpet, shutting down IOMMU etc
(native_machine_shutdown()).

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ