[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87hbex1nwz.fsf@ebb.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:02:52 -0500
From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn@....org>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
"Perez-Gonzalez\, Inaky" <inaky.perez-gonzalez@...el.com>,
Charles Marker <Charles.Marker@...eros.com>,
Jouni Malinen <Jouni.Malinen@...eros.com>,
Kevin Hayes <kevin@...eros.com>,
Zhifeng Cai <zhifeng.cai@...eros.com>,
Don Breslin <Don.Breslin@...eros.com>,
Doug Dahlby <Doug.Dahlby@...eros.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Subject: Re: Challenges with doing hardware bring up with Linux first
I assume someone started cc'ing me on this thread to get my opinion as a
non-lawyer GPL geek.
david@...g.hm wrote:
> However, there are quite a few files in the kernel that are BSD
> licensed, when combined with other GPL code, the only way you can
> re-distribute the result is under the GPL, so it is effectivly
> 'converted' when you compile, but by leaving the file BSD,
> improvements to it can be shared back with the original authors and
> put into their main codebase, so it's actually more polite to leave
> the license as-is for this file.
FWIW, I agree more or less completely with the above. I think the
implications are the same for ISC as well, as Luis points out elsewhere
in the thread.
--
-- bkuhn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists