[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CF67BBE.8050303@panasas.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:45:50 +0200
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] NFS: Fix a memory leak in nfs_readdir
On 2010-12-01 18:35, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 11:17 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> So this is a TOTALLY UNTESTED trivial patch that just adds another
>> callback. Does this work? I dunno. But I get the feeling that instead
>> of having NFS work around the odd semantics that don't actually match
>> what NFS wants, introducing a new callback with much simpler semantics
>> would be simpler for everybody, and avoid the need for subtle code.
>
> Surely somebody can have just looked up the page and
> gotten a reference count, right before your ->freepage
> call is invoked?
>
> CPU A CPU B
>
> look up page
> grab refcount
> ->freepage
>
> use contents of page
>
> Am I overlooking something obvious?
>
The page is not cached any more at this point therefore
looking it up won't find it.
Benny
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists