| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTikFt=dyEdsKp+VtU76pKyoLzdug1ZDPPD-3h=K-@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:33:48 +0000 From: Alex Bennee <kernel-hacker@...nee.com> To: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Problems using EXPORT_SYMBOL with lib/flex_array On 1 December 2010 16:19, Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:20:30PM +0000, Alex Bennee wrote: >>On 1 December 2010 12:05, Alex Bennee <kernel-hacker@...nee.com> wrote: <snip> >>Tweaking the lib/Makefile so obj-y included flex_array.o did >>the trick. >> >>I'm unsure if this behaviour is what is wanted? > > Yes, but not sure about flex_array.o. > Which functions in flex_array.c do you need in your module anyway? I want to use it to store a sparse array of ATM cell re-assembly buffers for my ATM over Ethernet driver. Using the per-vcc user_back structure causes problems when stacked with things like br2684. So I'm currently using flex_array_alloc/free/clear/put although I exported them all. I would have thought using library functions was preferable to rolling your own? I'm open to other suggestions though. -- Alex, homepage: http://www.bennee.com/~alex/ http://www.half-llama.co.uk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists