[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101201013547.GA19390@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:35:47 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch] debugfs: remove module_exit()
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:19:58AM -0500, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> debugfs can't be a module, so module_exit() is meaningless
> for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/debugfs/inode.c b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> index 37a8ca7..d38c88f 100644
> --- a/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> @@ -13,9 +13,6 @@
> *
> */
>
> -/* uncomment to get debug messages from the debug filesystem, ah the irony. */
> -/* #define DEBUG */
Why did you remove these lines? They don't pertain to this patch.
> -
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> #include <linux/mount.h>
> @@ -540,17 +537,5 @@ static int __init debugfs_init(void)
>
> return retval;
> }
> -
> -static void __exit debugfs_exit(void)
> -{
> - debugfs_registered = false;
> -
> - simple_release_fs(&debugfs_mount, &debugfs_mount_count);
> - unregister_filesystem(&debug_fs_type);
> - kobject_put(debug_kobj);
> -}
When the code is built into the kernel, the __exit function should go
away, so this isn't costing us any extra memory, right?
And debugfs used to be able to be built as a module, perhaps it will be
in the future? I don't think this patch is really needed.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists