lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101201.104546.39187178.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:45:46 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dpstrand@...il.com
Cc:	fubar@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: check for assigned mac before adopting the
 slaves mac address

From: David Strand <dpstrand@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:25:19 -0800

> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>        Ok, fair enough.  If we want to get back to the original
>> behavior, however, your patch should only test for zero MAC address
>> instead of testing for zero MAC address in addition to first slave.
>>
>>        -J
>>
>> ---
>>        -Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@...ibm.com
>>
> 
> Understood, that makes sense. The updated patch is below.

You need to provide a fresh posting of your patch, with a full
commit messag and proper Subject: line, as well as a proper
"Signed-off-by: " tag.

See Documentation/SubmittingPatches
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ