[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101201.104546.39187178.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:45:46 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dpstrand@...il.com
Cc: fubar@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: check for assigned mac before adopting the
slaves mac address
From: David Strand <dpstrand@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:25:19 -0800
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, fair enough. If we want to get back to the original
>> behavior, however, your patch should only test for zero MAC address
>> instead of testing for zero MAC address in addition to first slave.
>>
>> -J
>>
>> ---
>> -Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@...ibm.com
>>
>
> Understood, that makes sense. The updated patch is below.
You need to provide a fresh posting of your patch, with a full
commit messag and proper Subject: line, as well as a proper
"Signed-off-by: " tag.
See Documentation/SubmittingPatches
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists