linux-kernel - Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Dec 2010 20:59:39 +0100
From:	Heinz Diehl <htd@...tha.org>
To:	Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>
Cc:	Matt <jackdachef@...il.com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	htd <htd@...cy-poultry.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, htejun@...il.com
Subject: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective

On 01.12.2010, Milan Broz wrote: 

> Anyway, I run several tests on 2.6.37-rc3+ and see no integrity
> problems (using xfs,ext3 and ext4 over dmcrypt).

Not that this might help, but just for testing purposes, I have run all 
the -rcX from 2.6.36 on with Milan's patch (XFS filesystem) under heavy 
load and disk i/o, and have not encountered a single problem or corruption.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/