[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101201123341.d12ef362.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:33:41 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] NFS: Fix a memory leak in nfs_readdir
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:10:50 -0500
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -602,6 +602,7 @@ struct address_space_operations {
> sector_t (*bmap)(struct address_space *, sector_t);
> void (*invalidatepage) (struct page *, unsigned long);
> int (*releasepage) (struct page *, gfp_t);
> + void (*freepage)(struct page *);
> ssize_t (*direct_IO)(int, struct kiocb *, const struct iovec *iov,
> loff_t offset, unsigned long nr_segs);
> int (*get_xip_mem)(struct address_space *, pgoff_t, int,
It would be good to think about and then clearly spell out exactly what
state the page is in here. It is locked, and I assume clean and not
under writeback. What about its refcount, freezedness status and
eligibility for lookups?
And as Hugh pointed out, some callees might needs the address_space*
although we can perhaps defer that until such a callee turns up.
If/when that happens we might have a problem though: if this locked
page is no longer attached to the address_space then what now pins the
address_space, protecting it from inode reclaim?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists