[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101201204250.GA18395@amt.cnet>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:42:50 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] KVM: MMU: fix accessed bit set on prefault path
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:20:38AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 03:20 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>
> > Firs of all if guest is PV the guest process cannot be killed. Second
> > why is it a problem that we marked pfn as accessed on speculative path?
> > What problem it causes especially since it is very likely that the page
> > will be accessed shortly anyway?
> >
>
> Hi Avi, Marcelo,
>
> What is your opinion on this point?
Dont think this is an issue. Its very likely the page is going to be
accessed soon (unlike pte prefetch).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists