linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] NFS: Fix a memory leak in nfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:43:56 -0500
From:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
	Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] NFS: Fix a memory leak in nfs_readdir

On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 15:31 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > OK, the stop_machine() plugs a lot of potential race-vs-module-unload
> > things.  But Trond is referring to races against vmscan inode reclaim,
> > unmount, etc.
> 
> So?
> 
> A filesystem module cannot be unloaded while it's still mounted.
> 
> And unmount doesn't succeed until all inodes are gone.
> 
> And getting rid of an inode doesn't succeed until all pages associated
> with it are gone.
> 
> And getting rid of the pages involves locking them (whether in
> truncate or vmscan) and removing them from all lists.
> 
> Ergo: vmscan has a locked page leads to the filesystem being
> guaranteed to not be unmounted.  And that, in turn, guarantees that
> the module won't be unloaded until the machine has gone through an
> idle cycle.
> 
> It really is that simple. There's nothing subtle there. The reason
> spin_unlock(&mapping->tree_lock) is safe is exactly the above trivial
> chain of dependencies. And it's also exactly why
> mapping->a_ops->freepage() would also be safe.
> 
> This is pretty much how all the module races are handled. Doing module
> ref-counts per page (or per packet in flight for things like
> networking) would be prohibitively expensive. There's no way we can
> ever do that.

Although the page is locked, it may no longer be visible to the lockless
page lookup once the radix_tree_delete() completes in
__remove_from_page_cache.
Furthermore, if the same routine causes mapping->nr_pages to go to zero
before iput_final() hits truncate_inode_pages(), then the latter exits
immediately.

Both these cases would appear to allow iput_final() to release the inode
before vmscan gets round to unlocking the mapping->tree_lock since
truncate_inode_pages() no longer thinks it has any work to do.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/