[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101202103650.06647704@nehalam>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 10:36:50 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/2] bonding: sync netpoll code with bridge
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:35:42 -0500
Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com> wrote:
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> - if (unlikely(bond->dev->priv_flags & IFF_IN_NETPOLL)) {
> - struct netpoll *np = bond->dev->npinfo->netpoll;
> - slave_dev->npinfo = bond->dev->npinfo;
> + if (unlikely(netpoll_tx_running(slave_dev))) {
> slave_dev->priv_flags |= IFF_IN_NETPOLL;
> - netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(np, skb, slave_dev);
> + bond_netpoll_send_skb(bond_get_slave_by_dev(bond, slave_dev), skb);
> slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_IN_NETPOLL;
> } else
> #endif
Couldn't you eliminate #ifdef by putting the following into header file.
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
static inline netpoll_tx_running
...
#else
#define netpoll_tx_running(dev) (0)
#endif
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists