[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A24AE1FFE7AEC5489F83450EE98351BF288D88D2B8@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 10:35:00 +0800
From: "Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lethal@...ux-sh.org" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
"Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@...el.com>,
"shaohui.zheng@...ux.intel.com" <shaohui.zheng@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [8/8, v6] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: implement debugfs interface
for memory probe
Why should we add so many interfaces for memory hotplug emulation? If so, we should create both sysfs and debugfs
entries for an online node, we are trying to add redundant code logic.
We need not make a simple thing such complicated, Simple is beautiful, I'd prefer to rename the mem_hotplug/probe
interface as mem_hotplug/add_memory.
/sys/kernel/debug/mem_hotplug/add_node (already exists)
/sys/kernel/debug/mem_hotplug/add_memory (rename probe as add_memory)
Thanks & Regards,
Shaohui
-----Original Message-----
From: David Rientjes [mailto:rientjes@...gle.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 10:13 AM
To: Zheng, Shaohui
Cc: Andrew Morton; linux-mm@...ck.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; lethal@...ux-sh.org; Andi Kleen; Dave Hansen; Greg KH; Li, Haicheng
Subject: Re: [8/8, v6] NUMA Hotplug Emulator: implement debugfs interface for memory probe
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Shaohui Zheng wrote:
> so we should still keep the sysfs memory/probe interface without any modifications,
> but for the debugfs mem_hotplug/probe interface, we can add the memory region
> to a desired node.
This feature would be distinct from the add_node interface already
provided: instead of hotplugging a new node to test the memory hotplug
callbacks, this new interface would only be hotadding new memory to a node
other than the one it has physical affinity with. For that support, I'd
suggest new probe files in debugfs for each online node:
/sys/kernel/debug/mem_hotplug/add_node (already exists)
/sys/kernel/debug/mem_hotplug/node0/add_memory
/sys/kernel/debug/mem_hotplug/node1/add_memory
...
and then you can offline and remove that memory with the existing hotplug
support (CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG and CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE, respectively).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists