[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1291257830.12777.125.camel@sli10-conroe>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:43:50 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"sam@...nborg.org" <sam@...nborg.org>,
"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3]make readmostly section correctly align
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:28 +0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:02:21 +0800 Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > readmostly section should end at cache line aligned address, otherwise the last
> > several data might share cachline with other data and make the readmostly data
> > still have cache bounce.
> > For example, in ia64, secpath_cachep is the last readmostly data, and it shares
> > cacheline with init_uts_ns.
> > a000000100e80480 d secpath_cachep
> > a000000100e80488 D init_uts_ns
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
> >
> > ---
> > include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h 2010-12-01 16:49:48.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h 2010-12-02 09:22:32.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -192,7 +192,8 @@
> >
> > #define READ_MOSTLY_DATA(align) \
> > . = ALIGN(align); \
> > - *(.data..read_mostly)
> > + *(.data..read_mostly) \
> > + . = ALIGN(align);
> >
> > #define CACHELINE_ALIGNED_DATA(align) \
> > . = ALIGN(align); \
> >
>
> Surely the sane way to do this is to ensure that each section *starts*
> at an at-least-cacheline aligned address and then not worry about how
> the section ends. So shouldn't we be fixing DATA_DATA?
Some archs don't use DATA_DATA but directly use READ_MOSTLY_DATA, so I
change READ_MOSTLY_DATA.
> With your approach, .data may end up sharing a cacheline with
> some other section in some undesirable manner on a different arch.
>
> "fixing" DATA_DATA would involve page-aligning it, which sucks a bit.
> Things would be better if include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h had access
> to a globally-agreed cacheline-size, as it does the page size.
yes, there isn't a well defined cacheline-size for vmlinux.lds.h.
> otoh, .data.read_mostly is "special", in that it wants the tail end of
> its last cacheline not to share with any other section. Most other
> sections aren't like that.
yes, other sections don't need to be so.
Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists