[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201012030106.49226.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 01:06:48 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
"Linux-pm mailing list" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / Hibernate: Fix memory corruption related to swap
On Friday, December 03, 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 00:40:36 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> >
> > There is a problem that swap pages allocated before the creation of
> > a hibernation image can be released and used for storing the contents
> > of different memory pages while the image is being saved. Since the
> > kernel stored in the image doesn't know of that, it causes memory
> > corruption to occur after resume from hibernation, especially on
> > systems with relatively small RAM that need to swap often.
> >
> > This issue can be addressed by keeping the GFP_IOFS bits clear
> > in gfp_allowed_mask during the entire hibernation, including the
> > saving of the image, until the system is finally turned off or
> > the hibernation is aborted. Unfortunately, for this purpose
> > it's necessary to rework the way in which the hibernate and
> > suspend code manipulates gfp_allowed_mask.
> >
> > This change is based on an earlier patch from Hugh Dickins.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> > Reported-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
> > Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch is a fix for a regression and nasty memory corruption, so I'd like
> > to push it to Linus for 2.6.37 if there are no objections.
> >
>
> It looks OK to me for 2.6.37 but for 2.6.38 please let's make
> everything here a 100% no-op for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n builds.
> Specifically the slight overhead in __alloc_pages_nodemask.
OK, I'll take care of it.
> Because given the global nature of saved_gfp_mask and the unlocked way
> in which it is accessed, this facility won't be at all useful for
> anything other than suspend.
Right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists