[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim7brB0JecKXDNddt0am=Um457Kfbm6bRG_yzFM@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:42:49 +0100
From: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
To: Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl <pghatwork@...il.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mfd: Add UART support for the ST-Ericsson CG2900.
Hi Par,
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Par-Gunnar Hjalmdahl
<pghatwork@...il.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/29 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
> By the way, I will soon release a new patch set for CG2900 (hopefully
> next week), which contains major rework. It's hard to explain
> everything here and now but changes include:
> - Reuse of existing HCI line discipline under /drivers/bluetooth/.
> Line discipline has been modified so it is selectable from protocol if
> line discipline should register to Bluetooth stack or not.
So is it true that if there's the other chip with similar
functionality I have to implement support for, I'll have to pretty
much duplicate your line discipline driver?
Isn't it better to have a new line discipline that the standard
drivers (H4, LL, ...) will be applicable to?
~Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists