[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101203130528.GB19363@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:05:28 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To: Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/4] perf/core improvements
Em Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 05:10:44PM +1100, Ian Munsie escreveu:
> Excerpts from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo's message of Fri Dec 03 06:39:28 +1100 2010:
> > Ian, if you prefer, please test it before Ingo merges it.
>
> Have done so and just about finished rebasing my patches on top of these
> - I'll try to get them posted tonight. The bug I was working on is
> fixed, so I'm happy :)
Great!
> I haven't come across the bug that Thomas ran into, but then again I
> haven't been testing the non-perf parts of perf for this either.
I'll work on the problem related by Thomas today.
> Which reminds me, does anyone have a test suite for perf other than
> ./perf test?
Not that I know of, perf test is intended to be that, please consider
adding more tests :)
I want to do things like start a thread that will generate cache misses,
and then have a monitor thread measuring it, passing the test if it gets
into some range (its sampling after all), etc.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists